Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flickstree (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. WP:G5 likely also would have applied, but there is consensus to delete regardless. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flickstree

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable run of the mill startup that fails a number of criteria. Note this article was deleted previously via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flickstree, but was recreated later by a now blocked sock of the original creator. The current article added some sources, but these do not address the reasons the article was previously deleted for. The article currently cites sources that fail WP:CORPDEPTH and mention Flickstree only in passing or as part of a list, only mention the prominent investors in the company, or concern other subjects entirely, all of which qualifies the article for failing WP:NCORP again. The fact that after 7 months (the previous afd was in January 2017) the article creator has not improved the page in any meaningful way speaks as to to the notability of the subject. SamHolt6 (talk) 01:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The recent press releases about a former cricketer investing in this start-up do not change my opinion in the previous AfD that there is no demonstrable encyclopaedic notability. Still fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 07:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - coverage to date falls short of meeting WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. gongshow talk 01:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another promotional article by a disruptive sockfarm. Capitals00 (talk) 06:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can understand that Sourav Ganguly investing will attract some attention. But former sportspeople often invest in many companies. Unless there is something which independently sets this apart, I don't think this is notable. In the future is the company's video aggregator is used by many and generates news, it can be recreated.--DreamLinker (talk) 16:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.