Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlexiScore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- FlexiScore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable neolgism created by purveyors of product by the same name. See their website. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 16:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Clearly fails WP:NEO and WP:ADVERT. This term is not used anywhere outside of flexibilityscore.com, flexiscore.com, and bodyflexibilitytest.com, all of which are the exact same website. SnottyWong spill the beans 19:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with SnottyWong. Cullen328 (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While it may not fail WP:ADVERT, it most certainly fails WP:NEO. ITasteLikePaint (talk) 20:55, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sign on google of any significant usage beyond the company's own website(s). Its arguably a neologism and an advertising tool for the company, but those could be argued against, and the article fixed, if anyone had adopted the term. Its just too soon to qualify as an article. the business itself would be the subject of the article, which would have a fair section on this unit of measurement, but only if and when the product offered gets some notability, which it hasnt yet. It SEEMS like a great idea, but thats not for us to judge. Hell, i might even buy one.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Very little coverage by third party sources, can be recreated if it takes off. --Worm 11:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.