Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleasack
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete. James086Talk 17:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fleasack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm pretty sure this is a hoax or just something someone made up one day, but even if not, it still should be deleted for lack of notability. Dawn Bard (talk) 00:24, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the nomination. Ducknish (talk) 00:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, hoax. A creature from a novel that apparently doesn't exist. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:15, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Possible hoax.METOKNOWONLY (talk) 02:15, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete obvious hoax. No RS, silly names, silly links. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Going by the page history, this started out as a joke by Teddybrrr last July [1][2] before being tagged and used in the GettingStarted feature. Surprised no one noticed this sooner. Funny Pika! 15:13, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks as if it was PRODded and forgotten. Should have been speedied.Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I would have tagged it for speedy deletion, but I wasn't sure I could do that when a PROD had been declined, even though I think this should obviously be deleted. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks as if it was PRODded and forgotten. Should have been speedied.Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.