Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flavio Trevisan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flavio Trevisan

Subject is non-notable, no references, and possible COI with original author. Deadchildstar (talk) 01:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lack of nobility --DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 09:08, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Presumably "Lack of notability" is intended?
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —freshacconci talktalk 11:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no evidence of third party coverage. I made a Google search, and looked at the first 40 hits. It is necessary to weed out hits relating to other people with the same or similar names (e.g. Flávio Trevisan Fakih of Brazil, Flavio Travisan the stage director of Italy, etc) and then to ignore the artist's own site, facebook page, a blog, 2 advertising pages and pages which quote from Wikipedia. When one has done this one is left with a couple of trivial mentions, such as [1], which says "Definition of Flavio Trevisan (n.) (born 1970) Italian-born Canadian sculptor and artist", and that is all. A Google News search produces no hits for this artist at all. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - borderline advertising. Deb (talk) 21:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.