Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlashPack
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- FlashPack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability problem. No reliable sources or references. Admittedly, I'm not very familiar with this field. However, is this article really notable and necessary? Can't these few lines be merged with one of the various articles about Flash? Not sure there's much here to add. Thanks for your consideration and I apologize for any error on my part. HG | Talk 05:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: unsourced. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 05:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I searched for references, and other than the official website, I found little else --Fatal!ty (T☠LK) 06:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Fatal!ty. Simply put, there's just nothing here to build an article around. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Modernist (talk) 21:16, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.