Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flash-It

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flash-It

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic. No reliable sources to prove the notability. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable product; fails WP:PRODUCT. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - neither claim of nor sign of notability. --Nat Gertler (talk) 20:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete non notable product, poor promotional attempt Deunanknute (talk) 20:52, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Well sourced although overly detailed... Perhaps someone ought to put it up for FA status?.... –Davey2010^Talk 01:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For those who perhaps haven't yet realized .... I am joking!, Obvious Delete. –Davey2010^Talk 01:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Per source searches, fails WP:N. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.