Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First houses in Mid-Levels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. One two three... 07:50, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First houses in Mid-Levels

Notability: nothing that indicates why there should be an article on this subject. Admitted original research (see talk page). Sophitessa (talk) 22:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 23:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Property development is key to the history of Hong Kong and to help understand current land use. These pages show early history. In future, I intend to show how each lot has been redeveloped over the years. Can we rename these pages "History of Mid-Levels" and its sister page "first House on the Peak", "History of the Peak". These are intended as sub-pages to show the context of the exisiting buildings that are of interest. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anneliseconnell (talk • contribs) 06:57, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopedia. So the content would have to be rewritten into an article. If you want to do that I'm sure an admin will userfy the content for you. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:27, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that original research is not accepted on Wikipedia. Articles must be referenced and verified by reliable thrid-party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research for policy guidelines. --Sophitessa (talk) 19:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article is a an undistinguished list of stuff with no explanation as to what it is. -- Whpq (talk) 18:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unclear list; no claim of WP:N. JJL (talk) 00:17, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.