Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire challenge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 03:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fire challenge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. WP:BEFORE shows zero reliable source, only from 2014,which is the case of WP:LASTING.🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 00:27, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 00:27, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Multiple high-quality news reports are cited. In no way does the article read like a newspaper. UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 01:26, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All coverage is from 2014, no WP:LASTING. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Well, the "challenge" surfaced again in 2018 [1] and [2] as examples, so it seems to have some notability 4 years after these first sources. Oaktree b (talk) 22:52, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Article is finely sourced and I see reliable sources. Allblessed (talk) 01:26, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.