Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feedview
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:44, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Feedview (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 04:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - when I created this it appeared that Feedview would become significant in its own right (like DOM Inspector which shipped with pre-3.0 Firefox). I agree with the nom that it is not, and that Firefox's RSS functionality can be adequately covered by the article on Firefox itself. Cynical (talk) 12:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources, no article. Miami33139 (talk) 07:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.