Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Fun Pack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Family Fun Pack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This YouTube channel is not notable. Just because it only has a few references to reliable sources doesn't mean it should have its own article. The subscribers are probably just little kids who accidentally hit the subscribe button. Alsamrudo (talk) 21:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Fails GNG, you'd think a channel with 4 million subscribers would have more external references. South Nashua (talk) 14:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 00:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.