Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FX Copy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:29, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- FX Copy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was deproded by article author, but still seems to suffer from same issues of the sources being press releases and not being able to turn up independent reliable source coverage to establish notability. The only notability claim is a questionable one of being the first social trading network to be offered by an Australian based financial services firm that was directly link to the MetaQuotes' MetaTrader 4 trading platform. Not clear that even if that was established in reliable sources (which it is not) that it is a notable fact. Overall this seems like a non-notable FOREX trading website that has no reliable source coverage available. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. A Google news search shows no reasonable coverage of reliable sources. Dusti*Let's talk!* 02:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:42, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:50, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete DavidLeighEllis (talk) 19:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.