Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FUEL Design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FUEL Design

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged since March 2014 as possibly non-notable. None of the citations provided discuss the actual company in question, despite the best efforts of various SPA (some of which are IPs). My searches turned up nothing about the company to improve the article, which is also written like an ad and contains a lot of original research. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now at best as none of the current coverage seems to suggest even a minimally better noticeable article. SwisterTwister talk 06:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nothing on the search engines to show that they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.