Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exotissimo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete - reposted spam. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:31, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Exotissimo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:SPAM -- this is a page created by a WP:SPA who has changed his name from "Exo admin", which suggests strongly WP:COI. Is totally sourced to the subject's own sources. Subject was previously speedy deleted when created by same user. Nat Gertler (talk) 06:50, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not affiliate to this company. I'm am former employee, nothing else. Just because I choose a bad name in the past, doesn't justify the deletion of this article. And what about all the other companies? Do you guarantee 100% that who wrote the articles are not their employees? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecuriousguy (talk • contribs) 09:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Trying to distract the discussion won't wash. This discussion is about this article, that you created. Uncle G (talk) 13:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I based my article on this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gap_Adventures. Now could you kindly point out what I did wrong to deserve to be deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.46.156.3 (talk) 04:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.