Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exotic woods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:12, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Exotic woods

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is titled "Exotic woods", but actually, it is about wood. We already have article "Wood", so this one should be deleted. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I think this article intends to discuss the concept of "exotic wood", but it doesn't seem to be able to do it properly; no good refs are presented. Otherwise, it's a poor fork of wood. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Interesting and well written article, but lacks citations - and the one thing it doesn't do is talk about exotic woods! It doesn't even define what constitutes an exotic (as opposed to a run-of-the-mill) wood. I would encourage this author to help improve the article Wood. --MelanieN (talk) 01:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.