Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excellence in Teaching Awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 20:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excellence in Teaching Awards

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet WP:GNG. It has one primary source. The article is promotional WP:PROMO 8==8 Boneso (talk) 04:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Every award that exists at all is not automatically a suitable subject for a Wikipedia article, but there's no indication here of the reliable sourcing that would be required to make it notable. Bearcat (talk) 16:59, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This one is inherently of local interest only, and even then presumably not masses of interest or someone would have changed the line "Nominations for the current cycle close at 5pm on 24 March" at some point between March 2014 and now. Mortee (talk) 08:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.