Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM

Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a legitimate peer-reviewed medical journal that is listed in the PubMed database.[1] The stub was just created a day or two ago, let's give it some time to flesh out. --El on ka 21:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Published by Oxford, covered in the Thomson's ISI database. It should be expanded, I agree. I'm strapped for time right now or I would. II | (t - c) 01:23, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the above--being in ISI , a very selective database, is good evidence enough for notability. I'll join Imperfectly informed in trying to get these articles up to standard. I would strongly suggest that someone do a rapid close of the batch of nominations. DGG (talk) 02:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per everyone but nom. Edward321 (talk) 04:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per DGG. Support closing these AfDs promptly. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep as previously mentioned about the 10 other journals that were listed for AfD, STRONG SUPPORT closing all these d/t WP:SNOW Medicellis (talk) 16:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.