Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everyday Explorers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:54, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Everyday Explorers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems like an obvious case of non-notability as all my searches found nothing good aside from other related things and it also seems this website may no longer exist as a click through a search engine simply takes you to the main National Geographic website each time. With no possibility of merging (from what I can see) and no improvement, there's nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister talk 05:15, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:40, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:41, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:41, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree "Everyday Explorer" looks like it's no longer in use and there have not been significant contributions to the page in years. Maybe redirect to the main National Geographic article? If not, I vote delete. Knope7 (talk) 02:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If they do not exist and there's no information, no reason to redirect. Additionally, the name is in use for other entities,. eg Everyday Explorers Early learning Center, which are not notable, so the redirect would be misleading. DGG ( talk ) 01:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and Knope7 and DGG above. Can find nothing to establish notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.