Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evermotion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 02:53, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Evermotion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded by creator. My original concern was "No indication of notability - seems to fail WP:CORP. Please explain on talk how this article is notable." Sources seem of poor reliability, some are self-published. The author has not added any sources since my prod, only remove some content. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A review of the article and Google results appears to show that this article has not received the type of third-party in-depth coverage required by WP:CORP. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 03:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There really seems to be very little that could be regarded as coverage in reliable independent sources: most of what is available is clearly promotional in one way or another. (Note: The article was created by a single purpose account, which has edited only about one business and its products.) JamesBWatson (talk) 11:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.