Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Scribner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:45, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evan Scribner

Minor League Baseball player who has not played in any league higher than an AA (this year) and does not pass the drafted (with much consensus) Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Notability guidelines. There is debate within WP:Baseball about minor league players qualifying as "fully professional"

Good faith search brings up passing mention in articles about the team, no significant coverage of the subject, which means he fails the General notability guidelines. kelapstick (talk) 23:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This individual appears to be pass WP:BIO. The above search for sources was only for the past month. This Google News Archive search returns many more results. Cunard (talk) 00:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:ATHLETE.--Giants27 ^T/C 01:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

comment player does not pass Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Baseball (unless MID Mid-season all-star is being selected for an all-star game, which I don't think it is) which is a more lax guideline than the proposed notability guideline either.--kelapstick (talk) 15:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:29, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've added quite a few sources, as well as a link to the scout.com interview. Those, added to the all-star appearance, put Scribner into the "keep" column for me.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - The sourcing isn't great, but it's enough to meet WP:N. BRMo (talk) 19:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This article establishes the notability of the player, passes WP:ATHLETE, and is sourced. Borgarde (talk) 06:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete despite the addition of the new references, I do not think the player meets the requirements according to WP:ATHLETE. Mandermagic (talk) 00:42, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.