Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Sensenig-Dabbous

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene Sensenig-Dabbous

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD that I felt merited further discussion. Subject is a political scientist who I feel falls short of WP:PROF; citations in Gscholar were unremarkable. While he does have some quotations in Gnews, I think they fell short of the "substantial impact" standard imposed by the notability guideline. Ray^Talk 00:40, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Ray^Talk 00:40, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added some references to the article. I think him being the creator and leader of Democrats Abroad - Lebanon is good enough for his notability, in my opinion. He also seems to be fairly important as a political scientist. Silver seren^C 03:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. With GS cites of 7, 3, 3 fails WP:Prof. Can he pass on WP:GNG? Xxanthippe (talk) 04:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- I didn't think so, but opinions may differ - my checking didn't extend beyond the Gscholar, Gbooks, and Gnews links at the top. Ray^Talk 06:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails PROF with insufficient evidence of scholarly impact (cites, positions), and I don't see other support for alternate notability claims. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:57, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Provisional delete. He could be a player in the steamy world of middle eastern politics but the article's proponents will have to prove that. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 02:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article doesn't do enough to establish notability for mine. Capitalistroadster (talk) 09:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to Silverseren for improving the article! I hope that the amount of publications can be taken into consideration when thinking about his notability and that the article can be kept.Ketchupheinz (talk) 08:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Despite improvements to the article I'm still not convinced. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:22, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.