Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etherboy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ron Browz. Content may be merged at editorial discretion. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 13:31, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Etherboy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album, violates WP:CRYSTAL, and has only one source given that actually refers specifically to the album, and it only gives out a release date, the other sources are a music video which i'm pretty sure violates copyrights, a broken link, an article about Jim Jones, and a link to a song download. I would not be opposed to incubating the article either, however. Str8cash (talk) 23:54, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE There is a huge chunk of disputed content and sources. Go through page history to find it and take that into mind before casting your vote. STAT- Verse 03:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Release is in a month whats the point to a delete. What do you mean broken? It leads to a page that talks about his colaberators and the guest section is conbined with former colaberators and who was on the 4 singles. STAT- Verse 00:17, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per WP:MUSIC, future albums are not notable without significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Even with the disputed sources/content, there just isn't enough there. Hammer time. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Ron Browz, this is the first thing that nominator should do. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 04:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why, when he thinks it should be deleted? SGGH ^ping! 12:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I refer to when someone create a future album and this fails WP:NALBUM, the first thing to do is redirect it to a proper article e.g. Nightmare (album). If merging doesn't work, well nominate it for deletion. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 18:42, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - There's precious little to merge. Virtually all of the reliably sourced material is already in Ron Browz. I'm not opposed to a redirect, of course. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ron Browz per standard practice. ukexpat (talk) 14:01, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nomination, article fails WP:CRYSTAL.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs 05:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note - There are 3 votes for delete but in the AfD statistics, it is only showing 2 deletes that are counted for. Str8cash (talk) 01:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.