Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erasure (logic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:03, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Erasure (logic)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find sources supporting the definition of "erasure property" given, and it is unclear to me what "the propositions" is intended to mean here. The talk page has an unanswered request for clarification dating from 2007. Paradoctor (talk) 00:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 01:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Logic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in absence of sources. The only usage of "erasure" I can find in relation to logic is treatment-specific coinages equal to "deletion" (e.g. [1], [2]). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.