Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equivalence principle (geometric)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 01:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Equivalence principle (geometric)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No verifiable citations. No content worth merging in to Equivalence principle. Most of the text in the article seems to be from a 1994 arxiv preprint with 6 citations, 4 from the author of the preprint and 2 that to not mention the article topic. The text seems to be very mathematical and what little there is makes no sense to me. Johnjbarton (talk) 02:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Johnjbarton (talk) 02:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Adumbrativus (talk) 08:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The unpublished preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9405013 which this page summarizes is non-notable. It seems the article was created by an editor with a COI. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 09:44, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not a notable physics topic. XOR'easter (talk) 15:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's a strange point of view on equivalence principle, and I very much agree there is nothing here worth merging. Adumbrativus (talk) 21:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is unclear who might benefit from reading this unsourced article, which is barely more than a stub. Furthermore, I do not see any portion of this article which might usefully be merged into equivalence principle. Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog (talk) 12:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While the author of the preprint has the Wikipedia page Gennadi Sardanashvily, both he and the original author of the page have passed away so I don't think it is salvageable. If someone wants they can always recreate it later.

Ldm1954 (talk) 18:14, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.