Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equip4work

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Equip4work

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. I would speedy it but it makes a somewhat reasonable claim for notability ("first online-only office...") but I can't find anything to back this up. Also reads like a bit of an advertisement or directory listing. Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 14:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I would have done the exact same thing, brought it here. While it makes a claim of notability, it doesn't seem to made a very strong case and the bulk of the article is contact info, which bumps it up against G11. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More than happy to edit the article. Not trying to advertise at all. Would you prefer I delete the contact information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanphillips2013 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jean, yes we try not to use Wikipedia as a directory so removing the contact information would be a great start. Have a read over Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) and consider taking the article to articles for creation if it does end up being deleted. I'm happy to answer questions here or on my talk page. Thanks for being understanding and welcome to Wikipedia Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 15:01, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per G11. Mdann52 (talk) 12:55, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no indication of meeting notability criteria. Seems almost entirely promotional. What references are given either did not mention them (and have been removed) or are trivial. noq (talk) 14:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, unambiguous advertising, and I don't think that a claim to having supplied furniture for a TV show really counts as an minimal assertion of importance, either. Being an online business makes them less notable, not more. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete -- I find it hard to believe that a sales company with 55 employees isnotable. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:58, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.