Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envelope Collective

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Envelope Collective

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Mccapra (talk) 01:40, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:17, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:17, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:17, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete RS not available in article or search.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:59, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was able to find quite a bit of coverage from their Oberlin student paper, and a Wired article about one of the two collective members, but I don't think that either establishes N. Theredproject (talk) 04:25, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.