Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entertainment Today

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:52, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Entertainment Today

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Entertainment Today" is not mentioned by any third party sources, much less with any significant coverage, and therefore does not meet WP:Notability. 220.246.180.6 (talk) 15:44, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

created for IP after request at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#IP_nomination_of_AfD using rationale at Talk:Entertainment Today#Proposed AfD - ~ GB fan a "frantic, furious ball of anger" 15:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:15, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can not find coverage to demonstrate that this publication/site meets our notability guidelines. Gongshow talk 08:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.