Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineered information

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Engineered information (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obscure or unknown term. Unable to find references except mirrors of this article. Bhny (talk) 19:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete I think I've figured out who the sole reference refers to but this phrase is not used in conjunction with that name. I don't see a way to salvage the current content, as the article was created in a single edit seven years ago by an editor who hasn't been active since, and all subsequent edits have been tagging/untagging and minor formatting changes. Mangoe (talk) 14:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  02:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.