Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endless Entertainment
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Endless Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to establish notability and lacks verifiable references (includes self-published sources and blogs). No results from Google Books nor Google News on the subject. Fails WP:Corp --IShadowed 03:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG, and WP:RS. Already did my research when I first saw the new article. I may even have CSD'd or PRODed it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:24, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:24, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Also, article creator is affiliated with the subject. --Drm310 (talk) 20:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per nom. Search for the former name ("Arizona Pro DJs") and you will find many verifiable resources especially on Google News. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.37.199.248 (talk) 00:00, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Google News for 'Arizona Pro DJs' yields one, borderline reliable source. This hardly meets the criteria for the above guidelines. --IShadowed 01:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: IP 71.37.199.248 has made a total of 8 edits to Wikipedia - all of them to Endless Entertainment or this AfD. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.