Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EndChan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:42, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EndChan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not really seeing significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject (WP:N). Specifically, everything that's more than a brief mention is solely in the context of Bærum mosque shooting. As it's mentioned in that article, a redirect is probably in order, but a stand-alone article doesn't seem necessary. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:41, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:41, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:33, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The Bærum mosque shooting has covered all that matters about this website, which amounts to on sentence. I have no prejudice against a merger or redirection verdict, but deletion appears the most appropriate. flowing dreams (talk page) 08:20, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Outside of a sea of passing mentions, I found one [1], but that's about it. I'm switching to delete unless any more can be found. ミラ P 01:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.