Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emunah La-Paz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emunah La-Paz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Because PROD was removed without any significant changes, we are here. This writer is not noted in any significant reliable coverage. Blogs and passing mentions are all that could be found. Note, the author has an obvious COI with the subject.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:55, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Page reads like a puff piece and subject is far from being notable. Meatsgains (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I've found a few online resources that I think are notable. Creator has a clear COI but I'll try to edit/update the page. User:Rtt11 (talk) 18:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Page is a mess, but I did find 1 review in an RS: Kirkus on Memoir of a Jaded Woman. I have the feeling she may be TOOSOON. However, if Rtt11 finds more, ping me and I'll !vote. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm continuing to work on the page and am continuing to look for credible sources. It can be difficult because articles switch between her name and her pen name, but I've managed to clean the page up a significant amount. I do believe she is notable enough to have a page (even though the initial publish was a MESS), and I'm willing to continue working on it. User:Rtt11 (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:25, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 03:51, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I've significantly revised the page since the first deletion notice and could appreciate any help/advice - are the sources reliable enough? Should I get rid of anything? I do think she qualifies enough to be kept (although I'm newer to Wiki) and I think Wikipedia could use more articles on women authors, so it's my hope that I've done enough. Rtt11^talk 21:09, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.