Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EmperorLinux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. References have been added which established notability - the noms main concern (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 18:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

EmperorLinux

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this is notable, but perhaps it is worth merge/redirect to another Linux article? Boleyn (talk) 12:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I never heard of it before, but it's apparently notable: Tech Hive (PC World), PC Magazine. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Recent addition of refs seems to establish notability as per WP:N. - Ahunt (talk) 10:58, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.