Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Michael

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A speedy tag was applied. I might have hesitated if I had seen that it was applied by an IP address. But it is done so the author can go to deletion review if they object. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:25, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Michael

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run of the mill HR manager. Article is more of a CV, and makes no real claims to why he might be notable. The sourced, though many, are weak - lots of primary sources, blogs, articles by Michael and not about him, or articles that barely mention him. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:BIO. Hug^syrup 15:49, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the sources add up to notable. Definitely fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. This belongs on LinkedIn, not Wikipedia. Simon Wright (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article's tone is like a blog WP:NOTRESUME and obviously fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO as there was no any clear mention why the subject is notable.--Wakowako (talk) 13:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This has now been speedily deleted by RHaworth. Hopefully either they, or another admin, would now be willing to close this discussion accordingly. Hug^syrup 12:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.