Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embed-in-metal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:38, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Embed-in-metal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Expression does not seem to exist. Consider moving content to RFID Schuhpuppe (talk) 22:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The embed-in-metal phrase is used in the RFID industry and the wiki entry is to help define the term and have it become the standard. The alternate phrase, RFID-in-metal, is sometimes used but can be confusing so we in the industry are trying to build a consensus around one definition. The term is growing and so wikipedia can help provide the education on the term like it was built for.
- I am uploading more references:
- http://www.morerfid.com/details.php?subdetail=Report&action=details&report_id=6859&display=RFID
- Metal presents interference issues and requires special considerations for mounting.[1]
- The US Government has a ambitious plan to embed RFID chips in the new one dollar presidential coin in a test to see if the technology can be adopted for larger denomination coins. [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kellystark (talk • contribs) 12:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No. If a phrase is not used yet (and none of the references you provided actually use the term "embed-in-metal"), there is no point in having an article for it. Furthermore, Wikipedia's job is not to help any term "become the standard". --Schuhpuppe (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:NEO and WP:CRYSTAL; also suggest, Kelly, that you read WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:30, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - wikipedia is not the place to push a standard phrase usage. -- Whpq (talk) 16:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.