Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Email jamming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Email jamming

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination for 109.176.196.50: No evidence that this is a popular or notable thing to do, ref is nothing to do with "E-mail jamming". I can confirm this: there don't seem to be any sources out there that use the term in this sense. Hut 8.5 16:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a quasi-neologism. BBC News piece in article does not mention subject, and as the nominator mentions, does not describe anything in the article. This completely unreliable source is the only place I can find mention of this topic, and no books on activism or politics seem to mention this practice. Is this concept called something else, perhaps? I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 18:23, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - this sounds like a combination of spamming, hacking, and denial of service attack. Bearian (talk) 18:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with a possible merge of any useful contents to Emacs. The Emacs editor has had a "mail amusements" function "M-x spook" for years, which would automatically insert loaded words to a message being composed, with the intention described above. I don't believe this was ever referred to as "email jamming", however.Vulcan's Forge (talk) 22:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Another person trying to coin their own term? W Nowicki (talk) 17:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.