Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elite Guard (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sufficient consensus after relisting. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elite Guard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a collection of characters from a media franchise that shows no real world importance as a grouping. The references in the article only serve to reinforce fictional details without adding anything to establish notability. As an article, there seems to be no room for improvement. TTN (talk) 19:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SSTflyer 03:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at best for now considering there's nothing confidently evident to actually suggest a solid independently notable article. SwisterTwister talk 05:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per SwisterTwister and Joseph2302 LavaBaron (talk) 06:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While the Transformers media franchise as a whole is notable, not every fictional element of it is sufficiently notable for its own article. I don't see any justification for why this character grouping is sufficiently notable for an article of its own. (I think the grouping may well be notable enough to mention in another article about Transformers, if it is not already, but the discussion of it there should be much more brief than this article.) SJK (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.