Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electricity Generation from Underutilized Energy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:12, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Electricity Generation from Underutilized Energy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a personal essay based on original research. Fails WP:GNG and goes against WP:NOT#ESSAY. Tchaliburton (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete unless somebody can rescue this mess. As an essay, it's not even especially well-written or sourced; almost every source is primary. Bearian (talk) 17:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I started the clean-up. Can anybody help? Bearian (talk)

Comment. I'd say this falls under WP:NOTESSAY. CesareAngelotti (talk) 22:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability has not been established for the independent techniques described. Combining them into a single article does not improve things. Also be a WP:CRYSTAL issue here. ~KvnG 02:44, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's a long rambling essay and full of POV statements. Whilst there may be some interesting facts in there somewhere, the article needs to be split up and given a more meaningful title. Deb (talk) 11:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.