Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electric Retard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 February 7. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Electric Retard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No obvious notability. PROD was added, but removed by article creator within a few minutes without explaining why the article was notable. No references or sources. CultureDrone (talk) 18:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable and unreferenced. GaryColemanFan (talk) 18:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources, Banned in Germany is not a valid assertion of notability. Mr Senseless (talk) 18:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. D.M.N. (talk) 21:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete: The site carries a surprisingly high Alexa rank (51,000), but it is certainly unreferenced and fails WP:V, possibly WP:WEB as well, and after glancing at just one of the "comics," I'm not going out of my way to search sources out for such a disgusting heap of tripe. RGTraynor 22:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I don't see any reliable sources from a Google search, just mainly blogs and forums. "Banned in Germany" assertion is not sourced. I had a look at the website - seems pretty sick, but that's nothing to do with notability. However it looks non-notable.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 06:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete useless article. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - at best it could be cited in an article about subjects which are banned in Germany, if such a ban could be verified. It's not entitled to an article in it's own right under WP:WEB and WP:V. Xdenizen (talk) 00:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.