Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekpe Okorafor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 07:14, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ekpe Okorafor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not possess significant covered thus fails the general notability guidelines Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 07:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Technology, and Nigeria. Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 07:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as fails WP:NACADEMIC. Point 7 is debatable/related to GNG, but I don't think that higher-ups in companies are inherently notable without sigcov, which this doesn't have. Iseult^Δxparlez moi 14:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Little sign of WP:NPROF, nor of other notability criteria. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 06:43, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.