Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eeth Koth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Eeth Koth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unremarkable Jedi from Episode II. I don't believe he had even a single line NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 02:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Besides that he is only notable for one thing, his own death. Northwestgnome (talk) 03:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Eeth Koth was an article that died on Wikipedia. Delete JuJube (talk) 09:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: his death doesn't make him notable. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 09:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this one line article which fails WP:NOTE, WP:SOURCES and consists of WP:OR. -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 13:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: this is the article content: "Eeth Koth was a jedi who Died in Attack of the Clones". Fails WP:GNG for starters. Cliff smith talk 22:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree that characters mentioned but without an individual role in anything do not justify even a redirect. DGG (talk) 01:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Should have been speedy deleted. --EEMIV (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete R.I.P --SkyWalker (talk) 17:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.