Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EZ2Dancer
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- EZ2Dancer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wholly unsourced. No potential sources in other language WP articles. No hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. Please {{ping}} me if non-English or offline sources are found. – czar 08:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Not notable and not covered by reliable sources. AdrianGamer (talk) 09:14, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Popularity is not the same thing as notability. While these games have made somewhat of a splash, we just don't have the reliable source coverage that's needed for a serious article. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:39, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.