Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EPIC (cognitive architecture)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EPIC (cognitive architecture)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Tagged by Mikeblas 7 years ago, still unresolved. A couple of incoming links are potential redirect targets, such as Cognitive architecture and David E. Meyer. Boleyn (talk) 10:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioral science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wow, seven years? With no forthcoming references to establish notability, we should drop it. I think the presumption is that this model was presented in a paper, and the paper is referenced by other papers. The article claims that EPIC contributed ideas to other architectures; substantiating that might help, but it just hasn't been found. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as above. Seven (!) years! Neutrality^talk 23:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.