Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EComXpo (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ironholds (talk) 02:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EComXpo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't even exist anymore. Never met WP:CORP kept the second time on spurious claims. The sources contained are clearly for the most part not realiable or are primary sources like press releases. WP:CCC so lets delete this orphaned article of a non-notable corporation. Cerejota (talk) 10:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. "Doesn't even exist anymore." is never a valid argument. Once notable, always notable. Some of the references in the article are not independent, but there are enough references from reliable sources to pass notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:48, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Chicago Tribune coverage and this Washington Post article in the article serves to qualify notability. Northamerica1000 (talk) 01:06, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How does that constitute "significant" coverage?--Cerejota (talk) 01:36, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 15:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.