Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ECK master
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Eckankar. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ECK master (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The information on this article is almost entirely primary-sourced. Most is sourced to either the official Eckankar website, Paul Twitchell (founder of the movement), or Harold Klemp (current leader of the organization). When researching some of the "ECK masters", very little discussion is found in published sources outside of the organization. If anything can be salvaged from this page, perhaps it would be better suited as a section on Eckankar. ←Spidern→ 16:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Eckankar. The new religion seems to be gaining minimum notability, but it does not yet merit subarticles. And few "Eck masters" are themselves notable. a little insignificant 16:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Eckankar. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- Jmundo 01:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - I think that the term was used in the group from which Eckankar separated, which was a form of Sikhism if I remember right. But at present, article does not clearly deserve separate status. If and when more material is added and more sources found, including from the parent group of Eckankar, maybe separate it again then. John Carter (talk) 14:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.