Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Visibility
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:23, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- E-Visibility (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article appears to be a veiled advertisement for "eVisibility Research", to which the author has provided an external link. No reliable sources use this term in the context of generalized descriptions of website marketing (though it is employed, in varying senses, for the description of certain discrete geometry, computer graphics, and physics problems [1].) Peter Karlsen (talk) 22:39, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:07, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well beyond name dropping the actual topic here is "Website visibility" for which there are many Ghits, mostly of the how-to type as this one, so delete. This is partly covered at Search engine optimization, so I'll create a redirect for the more common search term. -Tikiwont (talk) 14:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.