Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic update client
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Dynamic update client (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced orphan stub. Online results are advertisements. Unreferenced since 2007. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - this fails the notability test as there are no independent reliable sources to support the claims in the article. This also had WP:CHANCE and I think it is time it is deleted. TushiTalk To Me 04:04, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Seems just a definition from 2004? Not even close. W Nowicki (talk) 18:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.