Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic HTML

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic HTML

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet General Notability Guidelines, has no sources 4E616D65 (talk) 11:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are quite a number of entire books written on this subject. It would seem to be copiously documented. Where did you actually look for sources? Uncle G (talk) 16:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A notable wide concept covered in various websites and magazines:

This topic was extremely popular from 1997–2008, it has its own O'Reilly book and its own For Dummies book. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:36, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Thjarkur's sources and a very, very weak deletion rationale. This is obviously a very notable HTML strand. Nate • (chatter) 19:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. To the nom, please, read WP:BEFORE. There's significant coverage of this topic in reliable sources, including academic journals, for over 20 years. MarioGom (talk) 14:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: WP:BEFORE gives you hundreds of sources. This is a well-known HTML Standard. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This embarrassment of an AfD discussion could easily have been avoided if the nominator had taken note of the contestation of deletion without discussion. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:31, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Very Strong Keep per everyone. No comment. CanadianOtaku ^{Talk Page} 04:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.