Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duncan MacLeod Timeline:1592-1691

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:16, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duncan MacLeod Timeline:1592-1691

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely uncited and presented in an in-universe non-encyclopedic style. Flagged with issues for 9+ years without any improvement. This fictional character already has a sizable article which presents this information in a more appropriate manner.

I am also nominating the following related pages:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsteffel (talk • contribs) 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This belongs on Wikia. Per WP:NOTPLOT, plot-only summaries of works do not belong on Wikipedia. This is also redundant to the episode plot summaries. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all timelines as WP:FANCRUFT best left to Wikia or succinctly summarized in respective movie articles. --Animalparty! (talk) 00:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is unlikely a better solid separate article. SwisterTwister talk 00:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All - pure fancraft. Above editors have it right, belongs on Wikia. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.