Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dub-core
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted as hoax. – iridescent 22:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dub-core (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
De prodded. I think it's a dance step, but it's hard to tell exactly. No indications of notability, and even if I were to include the google hits for the phrase, it's common enough that there's no indication it's what's being talked about here. Shadowjams (talk) 22:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (we ec'd with my own setting up an AFD on this). There is a legitimate musical style called dubcore, but this article is not about it. – iridescent 22:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Sorry about that. I figured you would do it soon. If there is anything notable about it, the commonality of the term makes it impossible to figure out, especially since there's no context. Shadowjams (talk) 22:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete I think this article got 4 simultaneous nominations! Appears to be a music style created by the author but which hasn't actually been recorded yet due to drug use. db-band, db-group and possibly even db-attack seem like reasonable grounds for deletion. I42 (talk) 22:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As further additions show that this is clearly a hoax, I've speedied this. – iridescent 22:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.