Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DualLiner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted as spam, user blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DualLiner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, obvious WP:COI, not third-party coverage, no indication of importance. Products cannot be A7'd. — Timneu22 · talk 15:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.