Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dronotics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:00, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dronotics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism. 300 hits on Google, of which 2 or 3 refer to a German company and the rest seem to be whois results and the like related to a .com domain. Prod removed by article creator. Kolbasz (talk) 13:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Neologism where the citations in the article don't even mention Dronotics which makes it complete original research and made up - Pmedema (talk) 17:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per reasoning given; if it was made up it might qualify for speedy deletion per A11 (made up/invented). 331dot (talk) 00:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.